Student reflections on visual art at the
Detroit Institute of Arts
On April 4, 2024, students in Professor Stephen Pasqualina’s ENL 3000: Writing About Literature visited the Detroit Institute of Arts (DIA). Following their reading of chapter 1 of John Berger’s Ways of Seeing, they were asked to focus on one work of art they had never seen before, or that they had at least never taken the time to look at closely. The reflections below do not attempt to articulate what each work “means” but instead explore how each student experienced the work in real time, how and why the work moved them, and the questions they’re left with following their encounters with their chosen work.
Double America 2 (2014) by Glenn Ligon (United States), part of the Regeneration: Black Cinema 1898–1971 exhibition
Jacob Yasso
I really enjoyed going to the DIA today. One piece that stood out to me the most was Double America 2 by Glenn Ligon. The piece made me feel emotional. It was very bright and caught my eye while walking through the hallway. There are two sides to the “America”: one turns on, one turns off, and then they synchronize and shut off. It felt like the push and pull between those who can easily identify as Americans and those who have a double-sided view of American identity. Whether or not this doubleness is a good or bad relationship I feel depends on the person. But I felt the bad relationship, showing the divide particularly in African American history. This was a perfect entrance to the cinema section of the Regeneration exhibit, as it also gave us the feeling of separation between black cinema and white cinema. The painted neons also had quite an important effect. It made me feel like the black paint over the neon was actually illuminating the room and that the white light behind it almost stood as stage lights reflecting away from the black paint. Overall, this piece was very simple yet generated a lot of questions for me about national identity and belonging.
The Last Supper (1786) by Benjamin West (United States)
Erin DeFever
The size of the painting is physically imposing. Reality is distorted by its immensity. Taking time to sit in contemplation of it feels like a radical act. We are alone. Unspoken. Deliberate. A visceral communion. To sit, to relieve the body of its unconscious effort of supporting itself. A small but deliberate act. Parasympathetic intensification of the falsification of materiality. The painting fills my field of vision, infringing upon the periphery. Erasing my experience outside of itself. Distorting my existence. Who am I, in relation? I lose and simultaneously gain a heightened awareness of my physical body in space. How big is this painting? How small am I? How small I am. We dance in pleasant vertigo. The illusion is strengthened by the mariner’s compass laid in tile at my feet. A curious anchor. Wujud. The stars glitter overhead. Ignis fatuus. The stars are only track lights. Oscillating between the microscopic and the cosmic. The painting is a window with a gilded frame. A window into what? From out of where? The wind howls and I catch sight of the full moon. Such majesty made tiny and peripheral. How small I am. The faces of the men frighten me. I see myself reflected in Thomas, dark and incredulous. Ever prodding at the wound. A guard passes through, keys ringing out like dread bells, destroying and fortifying the connection.
Leisure Hours (1864) by John Everett Millais (England)
Kammie Enriquez
I had quite the positive experience at the Detroit Institute of Arts. I was delighted by the fact that the public could access such beauty at no cost. I really treasured this experience, because part of me feels like I may never get to experience a museum like this ever again.
One painting that caught my eye was called Leisure Hours (1864) by John Everet Millais. The first element of the canvas that I noticed was the girls’ beautiful velvet dresses. Being somewhat of a fashion enthusiast, I thought to myself that they must have been quite wealthy, because the fabric, with its colour and texture, would have been quite expensive in the past. My eyes were then pulled to the gaze on the girls’ faces, and I felt emotionally moved. To me, they looked sad, or apathetic, or both. Their expression moved me because childhood is usually such a happy time where the demands of society have not become apparent yet. At the very least, that was my experience of childhood, and it contrasted so sharply with what was being portrayed on the canvas. Since the girls seemed to have a wealthy upbringing, I wondered what could be making them so sad. In all honesty, I did not even notice the fishbowl until I read the description provided by the museum. Apparently, the fishbowl symbolises the two girls being trapped by the expectations of their socioeconomic class. This explanation made it all ‘click’ for me. I was left wondering what happened to these girls in the future. I wondered if they retained their wealth as adults, if they ever achieved independence, and whether the girls eventually got married. Finally, I questioned if they ended up feeling satisfied with their childhoods and the outcome of their lives, or if they lived in a state of regret.
Despair (1820) by Samuel Lovett Waldo (United States)
Sam Gillmore
At the Detroit Institute of Arts (DIA), there were a number of paintings that spoke to me that I could probably write about for the rest of the afternoon. However, there was only one painting that felt personal, like it was waiting for me to find it: Despair by Samuel Lovett Waldo, located on the second floor. I almost walked past it because Kammie was trying to show me something she found in another room, and most of the paintings by it had portraits of domesticated mothers and chubby babies (which did not at all interest me), so I was surprised to see what looked to me like a teenaged face. I liked that she was on the ground, talking to the sliver of the moon above her like she was asking the universe for a favor.
I was surprised by the title because the figure depicted did not evoke a sense of desperation to me. I thought there was maybe longing in her face. I liked the idea that she was in despair, because she still seemed hopeful, like holding onto the idea of a wish was all she had left. She also looked so peaceful, crouched in between all of those trees, even though she was a woman alone in the dark, and I thought of the times I had walked for miles on end in the dead of night and still felt safe knowing I was the only one awake for miles. I tend to walk for hours when I can’t sleep, to nowhere in particular, just away from my mind. It started in the summertime when I was younger when I still lived in Georgia, and I hoped maybe the movement would tire me out. We have a huge stretch of woods behind the house, and we never really wore shoes to go outside because you get used to the rocks and sticks under your feet, and the neighborhood is built on a winding, hilly road around a lake.
Sometimes, the walking seemed to increase the thoughts I was trying to simmer, but if I found somewhere to perch for a moment, it helped to talk to the trees, which are always loud with wind and frogs (and sometimes cicadas) in the summer. Sometimes, if the moon was high enough, I could see it in the slight opening between the branches, just like the girl in the painting. The feel of the pavement under my feet is still comforting, so I thought her being barefoot was an interesting touch. But it seemed more like she had rushed away from something and did not bother with shoes, or rushed towards being alone: hiding from everyone else, but completely vulnerable in her togetherness with the universe.
Mask (Elvis Presley), aka “Elvisi” (mid-20th century) (Chewa, Africa)
James Whitener
Recently, I heard the DIA was voted among the best museums in the United States, and I must agree with this assertion. I attend about once a year, and every time I find myself completely lost in the labyrinthine halls, in a good way. The lowest level is my favorite; it is where ancient artifacts from cultures around the world are exhibited. I was struck with laughter when I came across a mask that was created by the Chewa people of Malawi to resemble American rock icon Elvis Presley. But I learned that the purpose of this mask was not to honor Presley but in fact to warn Chewa youth of his insidious influence. I wish I could have seen it: tribal men dancing to the beat of drums wearing an Elvis mask.
To me, it represents a rebellion against the insurmountable onslaught of Western supremacy that has plagued people around the world. In class, we have studied how language can represent the replacement of culture, and indeed, this replacement was enforced by colonial powers in Africa and beyond. But this artifact paints a story of how music can also play a role in that cultural replacement. The tribal elders likely saw their youth engaging with American music, thinking and acting more like Americans. I hate to imagine a world where ancient musical traditions are lost in the name of homogeneity or “progress.”
As Americans, we grow up in a society where technology, industry, and expediency are highly prized—but I feel people in first-world countries are hitting a wall where, despite all our material luxuries, we feel confused and disconnected. That isn’t to say we should return to hunter-gatherer societies. But we could afford to pause and learn from global cultures that give greater importance to family and community life.
Self Portrait (1912) by Otto Dix (Germany)
Cari Gamlin
I really enjoyed my trip to the DIA, as I got to witness and re-examine some art I’ve overlooked after my many visits to the museum. I really enjoyed the Regeneration: Black Cinema 1898–1971 exhibit; however, what really made me think about how I view art was a self portrait by Otto Dix. I’ve seen it before but never really dwelled upon it. Seeing this piece yesterday was like seeing it for the first time.
His appearance weirdly reminded me of many things in my life. I first thought of it looking like many friends and classmates I’ve seen in classrooms. I thought first of the posture, look, appearance and size of Otto Dix: upright, muted tones, a serious face, and, moreover, white. I immediately othered him, while also identifying someone I could see befriending since he held a flower. I thought of how different he seemed to me—thus why I looked at the piece for so long. This was a man who makes art, realism I think, who painted himself. Serious and stern with a flower. The background with a vibrant aquamarine contrast to his appearance. I felt attracted to how different it was from my normal obsession with abstract art and sculpture. I made a joke to my classmates on how he looks like a Gen Z in one of our classes, but I shifted near the end.
I thought, suddenly: he looked like me. Granted, I look nothing like him, yet I do, too: his haircut and clothes and his facial expression feel close to me. I wear neutral button-ups often, and my mullet I had, which formed into locks, is a similar shape to his bowl cut. Also, that face was what I saw in the mirror when I just woke up. I also (weirdly) have been told that I look stern or scary . . . He suddenly wasn’t scary or stern to me anymore. He moved me to see similarities and to see him. I thought of the pink carnation in his hand. I also love flowers and would carry them to my dorm when I looked like him. I like this portrait for how it has made me see me, and see others. I felt my thoughts. I like art because of the experiences that it gives me. I look for what I feel and I look for this understanding, this kind of catharsis.
The Three Skulls (ca. 1898) by Paul Cézanne (France)
Josh Otten
I don’t know if I didn’t get enough sleep on the morning of our field trip, hadn’t had enough to eat, or a combination, but I felt strange and even a bit woozy as I wandered through the corridors of the museum. I was thirsty, too, which didn’t help matters. Disoriented, I felt as though I was floating past paintings on the wall certainly deserving more reflection than I was able to give them. The air, the high ceilings, the colors all seemed to be rapidly moving around me, past me, even as I stood perfectly still in front of them. Finally, I sat down on a bench in the modern art exhibition hall in front of The Three Skulls by Paul Cézanne. I can’t remember if I was drawn to the painting and sat down in front of it or just happened to sit where it was hanging, but I sat and I was struck by its utter stillness.
The way that the background swallowed any suggestion of a room behind it, instead confronting the viewer with skulls arranged before them, in different hues, looking somehow despondent and perplexed and far away, and yet right there on that table in the darkness. They are so right there, so forceful in their stillness, rendered inert and yet having once belonged to people just like those in the lively portraits surrounding them. Next to paintings so alive with color, the skulls were death made real, tangible, touchable, inevitable, right there on the wall.
Madonna and Child (1651) by Carlo Dolci (Italy)
Giulia Vitale
I always enjoy going to the DIA, and even though I have been several times, there is something new to see every time I go—not necessarily new art pieces, but a new way to look at something I’ve already seen. One particular painting that I indeed had never seen before caught my eye. It is called Madonna and Child, and it was painted by Carlo Dolci in 1651.
A lot of people have painted the child Jesus and His Mother Mary, but this rendition was special because I noticed that Jesus was holding a cross in His hand. Then, I realized that I have never seen a picture of the child Jesus in which there was also a cross. I feel like His holding the cross is foreshadowing to His death on the cross. As a Catholic, this piece made me contemplate the art and what the artist was trying to communicate by adding a cross, when Jesus had many, many years until it would be relevant to Him. I thought it was a unique take because, like I said, I had never seen anyone else make that choice. I’m glad that I ran into this painting because I enjoy religious and Italian art, and it happens that the painter was Italian. I’m also glad that I saw it because it made me consider how the child Jesus is usually painted and portrayed without the crucifixion as an underlying theme.
The End of Uncle Tom and the Grand Allegorical Tableau of Eva in Heaven (1995) by Kara Walker
(United States) [life-sized installation] in Regeneration: Black Cinema 1898–1971 exhibition
Isabella Goolsby
I’m pretty sure I spent the majority of my time in the new Regeneration: Black Cinema 1898–1971 exhibit. I found the whole exhibit incredibly captivating, especially the sections where they would play old movie scenes or music videos. I think we often forget the contributions black artists have made to the culture of cinema and media, so it was incredibly eye-opening to witness everything displayed.
One of the pieces, The End of Uncle Tom and the Grand Allegorical Tableau of Eva in Heaven by Kara Walker, really disturbed me, in a good way. I have never read Uncle Tom’s Cabin nor seen the film, but I was still able to feel the suffering and agony Walker wanted to portray in a way she felt the film neglected. Walker’s piece emphasizes the hyper-sexualization of black women in both the novel and in US history. I really felt horrified (a productive kind of horror) by the one depiction of the slaver Simon Legree and the enslaved girl Topsy.
My overall experience was very enjoyable and enlightening. I absolutely love visiting the DIA and enjoy myself immensely every time.
Talking Oak (1857) by William Maw Egley (England)
Jannath Aurfan
One painting that caught my attention was a painting of a woman and her picnic titled Talking Oak by William Maw Egley. The experience of art defined in this painting showcases a strong vibrant boldness of color, and how she is waiting for someone, whether that someone came or not. She waited by the tree, and what the artist has accomplished is a mixed composition of colors that depict the emotions running inside this woman’s mind. It moves me to think how much excitement could be there on the other side of the tree. It moves me in a way to think about what this woman is doing waiting around the tree, wondering if there is more adventure, or if she is merely being too dependent on someone else.
I think having a picnic is peaceful and there is no need to have company, and you don’t need to be around people all the time. I think instead of wasting time waiting, I am wondering: what is she expecting from this other person? Who is she waiting for so that she can’t start eating in this pleasant weather? The questions this painting leaves me with are: what will happen to the food if it gets too cold, and would it be worth it to wait to meet that someone? I think she needs to look after her health. The painting leaves me concerned about her choices, as she’s not thinking about herself by thinking about that person (or the animal) that might arrive.
L’androgyne (The Androgyne) (1946) by Alice Rahon (France)
Myka Davis
There is a piece at the DIA titled L’androgyne (The Androgyne) by Alice Rahon. When reviewing this artwork by Rahon, I feel a sort of satisfying annoyance. When I look at the piece, I feel a part of my brain being itched because of its seeming likeness to the human body. That much I am able to identify. The annoyance comes when I lose that familiar feeling of recognition and find myself searching for what the construction is. It seems that the construction is made up of strings, but then when I look deeper, it looks like wood that has been bent into specific shapes [the piece is made of brass wire]. I swear I am seeing eyeballs on the lower part of the “body” as opposed to the top, where they obviously normally are. Why are the eyes there and not on top? I know art defies simple comprehension, but this piece was making me mad. Also, I swear I am seeing a BBQ fork where the technical shoulder and arm would be . . . but that’s neither here nor there.
Sidewheeler II (1913) by Lyonel Feininger (United States)
Grace Patrick
I hadn’t been to the DIA in a while, so becoming reacquainted with the art there was very calming. My chosen piece to analyze is Sidewheeler II by Lyonel Feininger, which was painted in 1913. The painting is abstract, but it is filled with pointy shapes.
I had this weird sensation of itchiness while looking at this painting, almost as if the sharp points were cutting my skin. I was able to make out what looks to be a sun of sorts on a horizon, sitting above waves. The colors are muted, which contrasts with the sharpness of the entire painting. I still don’t understand what this painting is supposed to portray, whether it be a sunset sitting above waves or hills showcasing a sunset, or something completely different. It also looks as if the sun might be sitting in a boat with windmills hovering over the boat, or even large spotlights. The mystery behind this painting is intriguing but irritating to my analytical mind. At closer observation, I found red smears towards the right of the painting. This makes sense to me, as Feininger might have been trying to create this essence of sharpness, which could cut flesh. At closer observation, there was a red cast upon other parts of the painting as well. I’m not entirely sure what Feininger wanted to portray even now, but I do know that he wanted his viewers to feel uncomfortable in some way with this sharpness, and I think the usage of red smears possibly imitating blood was quite clever. I still would like to understand what he had in mind when he was painting this piece, as well as if it is a conglomerate of concepts, or a landscape piece.
Bookshop: Hebrew Books, Holy Day Books (1953) by Ben Shahn (United States)
Emma Porta
I chose the painting by Ben Shahn which is located in the collection of Contemporary Art after 1950. I had never seen this painting before, although I had previously been to the DIA. My first reaction was positive, as I felt really attracted to the red and the many blurred colors in the window. I personally also really like the childlike painting style. The painting also caught my attention because the small, local edifications with such a “cute” aesthetic give me a homey and familiar feeling. I also noticed the sign, which made me like the building even more because it is a bookstore.
However, once I paid attention to the two human figures, all these feelings vanished. Their faces are scary, and the baby’s face looks old, turning the scene into something creepy and confusing. In addition, the baby looks attached to the woman, dehumanizing her.
I expected to contemplate a beautiful, small shop in the streets of a small tourist town in Europe, and I finished staring at two characters taken from a scary story. I wonder what type of intention the artist had, and if the painting represents something negative, such as poverty or war.
Diomedes Devoured by His Horses (between 1865 and 1870) by Gustave Moreau (France)
Gabriela Zavala-Jungo
I had been to the DIA plenty of times before this trip, but the art pieces being displayed are constantly changing. The work of art that really caught my attention this visit was Diomedes Devoured by His Horses by Gustave Moreau. When I first glanced at the painting, I walked past it, but once it was registered in my mind, I was confused by the painting and wanted to see it better.
I stood in front of the painting, very confused by what I was looking at. I then found the spots where the horses were biting the man and I was even more confused. I kept asking myself and Grace: why were the horses eating the man in such a vicious manner? Why were they eating, period? [This painting depicts an ancient Greek myth, in which Hercules lets these flesh-eating horses loose on their own master, Diomedes.]
It made me feel uncomfortable because it was not natural. Never in my life had I seen or heard about a horse eating a man. Seeing the evil manner of the horses and the face of the white horse, I had this eerie feeling. Horses are supposed to be pretty animals, not human-flesh-eating creatures. Then analyzing the man’s face, I felt pity, and I could also almost feel his pain. I certainly left disturbed by the painting.
On the Beach (ca. 1868) by Édouard Manet (France)
Hannah Cunningham
As someone who frequently visits the DIA, I feel I’ve seen everything. Yet, every time I go, I feel as though I find something new there, which is why I’ve always liked going to the DIA. During our trip yesterday, one painting that stuck out to me was On the Beach by Edouard Manet.
The first thing that stuck out to me about the painting was the lack of detail on the faces. It looked as though the faces were blurred in the painting. That specific detail (or, moreso, lack thereof) made me wonder if that was intentional, and if so, why?
Another thing that stuck out to me was how simplistic it was. Within the DIA are a few intricate pieces of art and sculptures, though I enjoyed this painting as much as the ones with finer details. I think this painting stood out to me because it made me reminisce on my childhood, as my grandma lived near Lake Erie, and I would often spend my days on the beach, collecting rocks, shells, and beach glass. This painting moved me because it made me stop and remember what it was like to hear the waves crashing, to feel the sand beneath my feet, and what it was like to skip rocks and watch them skip across the water.
On the Beach is a simple painting, but I believe there’s beauty in simplicity.
—————
For more information on the works of art featured throughout this piece, visit https://dia.org/collection—or, better yet, visit the Detroit Institute of Arts, open Tuesdays through Sundays. Admission is free for residents of Macomb, Oakland and Wayne counties.